With the increasing growth and complexity of networks to meet the ever-escalating demand for bandwidth and new services, the need for network automation has never been greater. Broadband Success Partners recently conducted 1:1 in-depth interviews with North American and European cable MSO leaders about what is driving their network automation strategies and the resulting implications for network automation in the cable industry. To gain multiple perspectives, we spoke with 25 cable executives from Network Engineering, IT, Operations, and Business Services, across a dozen Tier-1 and Tier-2 operators.

Network Automation: Where & When?


Each interview started with these questions:

  1. Have you implemented solutions that enable network automation in Next Generation Access Networks, Enterprise Business Services and Core Transport Networks?
  2. How far along are you?


  • Tier-1 Executives: Across all three areas, most Tier-1 executives indicated that network automation initiatives are under way or will be this year.
  • Tier-2 Executives: Not surprisingly, the timing noted by Tier-2 executives lagged indications from Tier-1 executives.

Network Automation: Why?

What most drives your network automation plans? Is it the promise of:

  1. Improved efficiencies and lower operating expenses,
  2. Reduced likelihood of human error,
  3. Improved customer experience,
  4. New service offerings, or
  5. Enterprise business services and SLA compliance?


  • Most executives say it’s mainly driven by the promise of improved efficiencies and lower operating expense.
  • Responses regarding the next most significant driver differed by MSO size:
    • Tier-1s chose reduced likelihood of human error.
    • Tier2s cited improved customer experience.
Network Automation Drivers by Company Size
% who rate the driver as the 1st or 2nd most significant (top 2 box scores)

To understand the reasons underlying their answers, interviewees were asked why they ranked an item as the most significant.

Here are a few representative quotes for why improved efficiencies and lower operational expenses is ranked highest:

  • “This is the broadest benefit for the company. Touches most things, systems, groups.”
  • “We must address network complexity without adding sophisticated staff.”
  • “We must eliminate swivel-chair order entry and associated errors.”

Network Automation: Why Not?

Though motivated to pursue network automation initiatives, these executives face several gaps and obstacles, which thwart their initiation or progress:

  • Tier-1s: The most significant gap for Tier-1s is the problem triggered by the lack of interoperability across vendors’ different hardware and software. The overriding view is that each vendor, striving to get as much of a client’s business as possible, is not motivated to deliver open solutions. Some of the executives cited a “need to rely on standards.” Others are looking for “a tool that will work with all vendors.” In some cases, the problem is so severe that “the challenges with multi-vendor automation have kept our processes manual.”
  • Tier-2s: Tier-2 executives rank “the network automation software is not advanced enough” as the greatest gap. As one executive explained, “A lot of legacy equipment doesn’t have the reporting features [telemetry] necessary to specify the parameters required to make [network automation] decisions.”

When asked about network automation obstacles, most of the executives called out the greatest obstacles to achieving further or full network automation as:

  • Decision-makers (not yet convinced of the value), and
  • Budgets (they have yet to approve)

When viewed on the basis of functional area, the data reveals that over 80% of those in Business Services view the greatest obstacle as the lack of budget. According to one of these executives, “We’ve yet to find the tipping point for the financial justification.”

Network Automation Obstacle by Function
% who rate the obstacle as the 1st or 2nd most significant (top 2 box scores)

The link between the budget and the decision-maker is clear in several comments:

  • “Until decision-makers can see ROI, they’d rather focus on immediate priorities. Finance needs to prove ROI and convince decision-makers.”
  • One executive succinctly captured the reason her decision makers are balking: “Decision-makers won’t be convinced until there’s pain. We’ve operated a long time without automation.”

How can you use these insights?

As the research reveals, the network automation journey is a multi-faceted one. As such, it’s best to start with a holistic view. Develop a comprehensive automation framework to avoid the risk of creating inefficiencies with automation islands. Even if you’ve already started your network automation journey, it’s not too late to step back and look at the bigger picture from an end-to-end perspective.

These are just a few of the findings and implications. For a more in depth perspective read the white paper entitled “Cable Move to Network Automation - Why, Why Not, Where, How and When?”

and be sure to join us, your peers and the whole network ecosystem as these and other leaders converge at MEF19 in Los Angeles, this 18-22 November exploring all things ‘automation’ including MEF’s LSO.

David David

David Strauss is a principal of Broadband Success Partners, a consultancy focused on the marketing, technology, finance and operations needs of service and technology providers. He has over 25 years of senior marketing, business development and sales experience in B2B telecommunications and technology. Prior to starting Broadband Success Partners, David designed and executed the marketing plan for the Metro Ethernet services of Comcast Business. He was also the VP of Marketing for Lightpath (Cablevision/Altice) and worked in wireless business units of Sprint and AT&T.

Other Posts
Kelly Hoople
Director Product Development - Cox Business
Created: 2019-11-11

A substantial portion of today’s $60B Carrier Services’ market includes wholesale services supplied by one operator to another in order extend the service footprint beyond the retail service provider’s network reach. For many years, one of the challenges for the data connectivity services industry has been the lack of visibility into the performance of a Carrier Ethernet service in the sections running over wholesale partners’ networks. When a Carrier Ethernet service spanning networks from multiple operators starts to experience exceptions to the Service Level Agreement between the Service Provider and the enterprise subscriber, identifying the location of the source of the problem has been a highly manual process resulting in very slow responses with minimal information to customer concerns about performance.

MEF has defined standards for Carrier Ethernet Fault Management (MEF 30.1) and Carrier Ethernet Performance Monitoring (MEF 35.1), based on Y.1731, which have been in wide use by operators within their own respective domains for many years. However, when it comes to automated access to relevant information based on MEF 30.1 and MEF 35.1, the picture has been far less positive—that is until now. MEF 3.0 PoC (117), ‘MEF SOAM for High Value Multi-Operator Carrier Ethernet Services,’ led by Comcast and Cox with the collaboration of Ciena and Nokia, shows how the MEF’s LSO (Lifecycle Service Orchestration) federation paradigm for orchestrating services spanning multiple operator domains—used in conjunction with well-established Service OAM mechanisms defined by MEF—provides a great deal of value, both to service providers and their enterprise customers. To gain further insight into multi-Operator SOAM for Carrier Ethernet, Daniel Bar-Lev, VP Strategic Programs at MEF, discussed the topic with Kelly Hoople, Director Product Development at Cox Business.

Nicolas Thomas
SDN/APIs Strategist - Fortinet
Created: 2019-11-07

The MEF 3.0 PoC (115) will be of great interest to service providers that want to offer advanced managed SD-WAN services based on MEF 70 to enterprise customers using cloud services from branches with Internet access.

Fortinet, TCTS, and Spirent, have joined together to demonstrate the use case of secure Local Internet Breakout connecting to O365 and Azure from branch offices. To gain further insight on this project, Daniel Bar-Lev spoke with Nicolas Thomas, from Fortinet to understand this MEF 3.0 PoC.